Modeling Inequity Aversion in a Dictator Game with Production
نویسندگان
چکیده
We expand upon the previous models of inequity aversion of Fehr and Schmidt (1999) and Frohlich, Oppenheimer and Kurki (2004), which assume that dictators get disutility if the final allocation of the surplus deviates from the equal split (egalitarian principle) or from the subjects’ production (libertarian principle). In our model, dictators may also account for the way in which the surplus was generated. More precisely, our model incorporates the idea of the liberal egalitarian ethics into the analysis, making it possible for dictators to divide the surplus according to the accountability principle, which states that subjects should only be rewarded for factors under their control. This fairness ideal does not hold subjects responsible for factors beyond their control in the production of the surplus, an idea that is absent in the models of inequity aversion cited above.
منابع مشابه
Separating Gratitude from Guilt in the Laboratory
In contrast to guilt based reciprocity, which hypothesizes that reciprocity is an increasing function of the 2 order expectation of trustor’s expectation for reciprocation, we test for reciprocity which is a decreasing function of trustees 2 order expectations, i.e., that people can reciprocate out of gratitude. To unambiguously decrease 2 order expectations in our treatment, we broke up a stan...
متن کاملThe Role of Equality and Efficiency in Social Preferences
Engelmann and Strobel (AER 2004) question the relevance of inequity aversion in simple dictator game experiments claiming that a combination of a preference for efficiency and a Rawlsian motive for helping the least well-off is more important than inequity aversion. We show that these results are partly based on a strong subject pool effect. The participants of the E&S experiments were undergra...
متن کاملFairness in Risky Environments: Theory and Evidence
The relationship between risk in the environment, risk aversion and inequality aversion is not well understood. Theories of fairness have typically assumed that pie sizes are known ex-ante. Pie sizes are, however, rarely known ex ante. Using two simple allocation problems—the Dictator and Ultimatum game—we explore whether, and how exactly, unknown pie sizes with varying degrees of risk (“endowm...
متن کاملHayat Khan Modeling Social Preferences: A Generalized Model of Inequity Aversion Economics and Econometrics Research Institute EERI
This paper argues that a generalized model of social preferences must simultaneously pass two tests; the Variety Test (explain outcomes under variety, the V-test) and the Psychological Test (conform to psychological intuition, the P-test). It is shown that none of the models proposed to date unconditionally passes these tests. The paper extends the Fehr and Schmidt model of inequality-aversion ...
متن کاملModeling other - regarding preferences and an experimental test ∗
Behavior inconsistent with self-interest has been observed in many contexts. We argue that models designed to cope with these anomalies are inadequate to deal with a variety of social values. Our extension of the Fehr & Schmidt ‘inequity aversion’ model is applied to results from dictator experiments in which the money to be divided is generated by the efforts of paired individuals in either on...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Games
دوره 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012